|
|
Post by motowner on Aug 5, 2006 15:09:24 GMT -5
I've been having this wierd thought and i'm just wondering, if david sung lead on baby i need your loving, would you think it would be a bigger hit than the four tops? i wanna know what ya'll think on this 1!!!
|
|
Kay
Star
*~*Floever A Star*~*
Posts: 1,326
|
Post by Kay on Aug 5, 2006 19:13:40 GMT -5
I doubt it woulda been a bigger hit but I would love to here him try :boogie: :boogie:
|
|
|
|
Post by timmy84 on Aug 5, 2006 19:23:46 GMT -5
As a solo artist, he would've kilt it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Motown Honey on Aug 6, 2006 10:42:06 GMT -5
Not a bigger hit, but nice album filler
|
|
|
|
Post by timmy84 on Aug 6, 2006 11:32:41 GMT -5
You can't turn back the hands of time.  |
|
|
|
Post by Emerald City on Aug 6, 2006 15:02:08 GMT -5
Do you mean Ruff as a solo or as lead with the group  ... I'm just comparing because on a solo version I imagine just the Andantes backing him up ... but even if it were the Temptations giving their own version I think it would have been a hit on the R&B charts  |
|
|
|
Post by timmy84 on Aug 6, 2006 23:39:48 GMT -5
It wouldn't have sound right with the Temptations because they rarely had female background singers and only tried a few times with the Andantes (and later the Supremes) since the Temps were known for the five part harmony. The Four Tops and Andantes worked this song because it fit the type of drama that goes with being in love. Just the right groups for the right song. But if it had been recorded with just the Temptations, it would've been nice but it wouldn't had been a hit.
|
|
|
|
Post by Emerald City on Aug 7, 2006 14:11:39 GMT -5
Guess I'm in the minority  |
|
